Former judge pleads guilty to DWI

Last updated Friday, January 26, 2007 6:33 PM CST in News

By The Associated Press

    NASHVILLE -- Former district judge Jim Bob Steel, who is also an ex-prosecutor, has pleaded guilty to a drunken driving charge.

    Steel entered his guilty plea Jan. 18 in Howard County District Court and Judge Ed Alford sentenced him to one day in jail, which Steel served the day of his arrest. Alford also fined Steel $750, suspended his driver license for three months and ordered him to attend driving school. The charge was for a first DWI offense.

    Steel was also fined $90 for speeding and ordered to pay court costs of $1,055.

    Steel was arrested the afternoon of Jan. 12 by Mineral Springs patrol officer Jeff Witherspoon on Arkansas 355.

    Witherspoon found an open can of beer in the vehicle. After being booked into jail, the former judge was released to his daughter.

    The incident was Steel's second arrest in the past 19 months involving traffic charges.

    In June 2005, he was arrested on felony and misdemeanor charges after a traffic accident, also on Arkansas 355. Police said Steel's vehicle crossed the center line and struck a van. He reportedly left the scene on foot and went home, where he was arrested.

    A felony charge of leaving the scene of an accident was dropped in a plea agreement. Steel paid an $800 fine, according to his attorney, Jeff Harrelson of Texarkana.

    Steel also had to resign as Pike County District judge, which he did May 11, 2006.

    Reader Comments (3 comment(s))


    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsibility of their authors. The Morning News does not review comments before their publication, nor do we guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by our comment policy. If you see a comment that violates our policy, please notify the web editor.

    not surprised wrote on Jan 28, 2007 7:56 AM:

    " And to think, this guy was a Judge! "

    Government is People wrote on Jan 28, 2007 8:36 AM:

    " Why should I trust ANY OF THEM? WHY SHOULD YOU? I can fill VOLUMES on abuses by people in the government who have taken bribes, who have lied on witness stands, who have lied to convict people of things they didn't do, who have murdered, raped, stolen, dealt in drugs, been caught with child pornography, masturbated while actually sitting on the bench judging cases, flashed children in parks, tasered and killed innocent people, etc, etc. I could fill VOLUMES. So why should we trust ANY OF THEM? IT ISN'T ANY OF THEIR DAMNED BUSINESS. PERIOD. WHEN ARE "THEY" GOING TO UNDERSTAND? Since PEOPLE are who make up the government and PEOPLE are not perfect in many ways, why should we trust ANY of OUR sensitive personal information to STRANGERS? "

    He Wore the Black Bat Suit wrote on Jan 28, 2007 8:42 AM:

    " to think the man who wore the black bat suit claimed jurisdiction to convict many good people "


    *Member ID:
    *Password:
      Forgot Your Password?
     

    Not already registered?
    Register Now

    Sponsors