Feds Oppose Bill To Expand School Benefits For Reservists

Last updated Wednesday, February 28, 2007 6:58 PM CST in News

By Fred Love
The Morning News

    WASHINGTON -- Officials from the Pentagon and Department of Veterans Affairs said Wednesday they do not support a bill that would expand education benefits for National Guard and Reserve troops.

    They said the initiative could prove to be expensive and might hurt the miltary's efforts to retain soldiers.

    The bill, sponsored by five House lawmakers including two from Arkansas, would allow reservists to take advantage of school loans and subsidies through the GI Bill for up to 10 years after leaving the military.

    Currently, school benefits for Guard members and reservists end when they retire from the service.

    The VA supports the intent of the bill but can't back it until its costs become clear, said Keith Wilson, VA education service director, told members of the House military personnel subcommittee.

    Michael Dominguez, undersecretary of defense for personnel and readiness, said the bill may drive down retention rates in the National Guard and Reserves because soldiers will no longer need to re-enlist to continue to receive educational benefits.

    "We need incentives that encourage our reservists to stay with us, not to leave," Dominguez said.

    Second District Rep. Vic Snyder, R-Little Rock, chairman of the subcommittee and sponsor of the bill, said that while the measure may hurt retention, it would boost recruitment by offering more flexible education benefits.

    Snyder said the current policy disrupts the education of many reservists and Guard members who have been deployed and can't continue their studies.

    "People are being mobilized and then they come back and their enlistment is winding down. So they decide not to re-enlist and then their education benefit isn't there," Snyder said, adding that such situations are "just not fair" to the soldiers.

    Wilson and Dominguez also opposed a provision that would shift GI Bill management from the Pentagon to the Department of Veterans' Affairs.

    Wilson said the Department of Defense is better-equipped to handle the administering of "kickers," or bonuses used to recruit for unpopular positions.

    Third District Rep. John Boozman, R-Rogers, is among the bill sponsors in the House. Sen. Blanche Lincoln, D-Ark., is backing a similar measure in the Senate.

    Reader Comments (1 comment(s))


    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsibility of their authors. The Morning News does not review comments before their publication, nor do we guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by our comment policy. If you see a comment that violates our policy, please notify the web editor.

    Doris_Wilson1@yahoo.com wrote on Mar 5, 2007 5:45 PM:

    " Yes the benefits should be expanded because that is solely the reason most military employees are looking for.Most cannot afford college and after or over is problem the time they can attend a school without the pressure of being called up.They can do the same as the full timers we see by this war so why not?I heard some went out with the Marines in IrAQ eventhough they already have a dangerous job to do in whatever circustances,so educate now,yes.Stop taking away priviledges away from our American SOLDIERS.Thhey are trying hard to keep their HEADS working after so much turmoil they have been through.Give to them as much as possible they deserve it. Yes expand the privileges. "


    *Member ID:
    *Password:
      Forgot Your Password?
     

    Not already registered?
    Register Now

    Sponsors