Rove defends firing of U.S. attorneys

Last updated Thursday, March 8, 2007 7:54 PM CST in News

By John Lyon
The Morning News

    LITTLE ROCK -- White House political adviser Karl Rove on Thursday defended the administration's controversial firing of Arkansas' Bud Cummins and seven U.S. attorneys.

    President Bush's senior adviser declined to comment on the criminal conviction of I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby Jr., former chief of staff to Vice President Dick Cheney.

    Speaking at the Statehouse Convention Center in an appearance sponsored by the University of Arkansas' Clinton School of Public Service, Rove said the Bush administration's firing last year of eight U.S. attorneys was "normal and ordinary."

    "By law, and by Constitution, these attorneys serve at the pleasure of the president. They traditionally are given four-year term limits," he said.

    Rove said the Bush administration has appointed 128 U.S. attorneys since the president took office. Bill Clinton appointed 123, he said.

    "Some of these were removed for cause. Some of them, there were policy disagreements. One U.S. attorney refused to file death penalty cases. Another U.S. attorney who did an otherwise excellent job in the San Diego district refused to file immigration cases," Rove said.

    Rove did not specifically mention Cummins, formerly U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Arkansas, who was replaced by interim U.S. Attorney Tim Griffin, a former assistant to Rove.

    A Justice Department official has said there were no performance or policy problems with Cummins.

    Rove said some in Congress are playing politics with the appointments.

    "The question is, did they have the same reaction if they were in Congress in the '90s, or did they have the same reaction if they were in the '80s? Because every president comes in, appoints U.S. attorneys and then makes changes in the course of their time," he said.

    Some have accused the Bush administration of taking advantage of a provision in the Patriot Act that allows the president to appoint interim U.S. attorneys without Senate confirmation.

    Rove said the administration wants the appointees to go through the confirmation process.

    Griffin, however, has said he does not plan to seek confirmation because of the political firestorm surrounding his appointment.

    Griffin, who was in the audience Thursday, declined to comment on Rove's remarks. Griffin said Rove had not spoken with him since arriving in Little Rock, and the two had no plans to meet.

    Rove's appearance came two days after a federal jury found Libby guilty of obstruction of justice, giving false statements to the FBI and committing perjury twice before a grand jury.

    The charges resulted from an investigation into the leak of the identity of a CIA officer, Valerie Plame Wilson, to the media. Columnist Robert Novak has testified Rove confirmed Wilson's identity to him before Novak revealed her identity in a column.

    No criminal charges were brought against Rove, but he, Libby and Cheney are being sued by Valerie Wilson and her husband, Joseph Wilson, who claim Valerie Wilson's identity was revealed in retaliation for Joseph Wilson's criticism of the administration's actions leading up to the Iraq war.

    Rove said he was advised by White House counsel not to comment on Libby's conviction.

    "I can say anybody who worked with him and anybody who knows him and his wife, Harriet Grant, is sad about it," he said.

    Regarding the war, Rove said, "I think history will look back and judge this as the right thing. A difficult struggle, conducted for the right reasons and concluded in the right way."

    Reader Comments (18 comment(s))


    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsibility of their authors. The Morning News does not review comments before their publication, nor do we guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by our comment policy. If you see a comment that violates our policy, please notify the web editor.

    a former republican wrote on Mar 8, 2007 8:32 PM:

    " Too bad we can't fire all of this "village idiots" and all his cabinet. History will bear out that this administration was the most corrupt and by far the worst in years. I still wander if this administration is running scared and wanted to get rid of someone that might go after them. If Mr. Bush, pardens Libby, he SHOULD be impeaced! "

    Impeach them all!! wrote on Mar 8, 2007 9:11 PM:

    " NOW!! "

    catsmeow wrote on Mar 9, 2007 8:06 AM:

    " I just don't think that the pres. should have that much power. Libby just should not be pardoned. "

    good start wrote on Mar 9, 2007 10:10 AM:

    " That's all Libby's conviction is. Charges need to be filed against Rove and Cheney and even bushie, among others. "

    Observer wrote on Mar 9, 2007 2:54 PM:

    " Libby should go to jail...but only if they go get Bill Clinton and put him in the next cell. He did the same thing Libby is accused of...lying before a grand jury....felony perjury. Why does he get a buy and Libby goes to jail? Fair is fair. "

    Con Artist in Chief wrote on Mar 9, 2007 7:57 PM:

    " Anyone read Krugman's article in the NYT? Apparently, the rabbit hole goes much deeper. Bush and Rove pressured the Justice Dept. to aggressively prosecute Democrats while looking the other way when the alleged perp was a Republican. The numbers are in and it ain't pretty. "

    To Observer wrote on Mar 10, 2007 1:29 PM:

    " Last I checked Clinton did not "get a buy" as you put it. Clinton was acquitted by the Senate on February 12, 1999 of the impeachment charge by the House of Representatives. The charges were perjury and obstruction of justice. After a 21-day trial, the Senate vote fell short of the two-thirds majority required for conviction and removal from office under the Constitution. "

    Hank wrote on Mar 11, 2007 4:16 AM:

    " I am beyond words. "

    Observer wrote on Mar 11, 2007 2:27 PM:

    " Strange isn't? Liberals decried the impeachment of Clinton for perjury and obstruction of justice, but embrace the prosecution of Libby for the same? Both deserved prosecution- it is just interesting to notice the hypocrisy of the left. Now, to start prosection of the Clinton confidant who thinks it acceptable to stuff confidential documents down his pants, then take them home and shred them... "

    Hank wrote on Mar 11, 2007 2:32 PM:

    " Clinton was not convicted on the impeachment charges, which DID NOT contain the obstruction charge. He was never tried by a court for his perjury. He should be, but that was then, this is now. Clinton pardoned more criminals than any other U. S. President in history. If Bush does pardon Libby, it is at it should be. This whole thing was nothing but an over zealous prosecutor looking to get the administration. It's politics as usual. "

    Wishful Thinking wrote on Mar 11, 2007 2:39 PM:

    " Bush has made himself too powerful. Under impeachment hearings, he would issue a signing statement that you can't impeach a president in a time of war. He would grant all of his cronies immunity from questioning under oath (Bush/Cheney 911 commission). And if anyone did get indicted, he would instantly pardon them (time will tell, but my money is on that one). "

    a former republican = idiot wrote on Mar 11, 2007 2:53 PM:

    " "a former republican" would be well-advised to learn to spell. "

    Get Real wrote on Mar 11, 2007 3:17 PM:

    " Now What! The Democrats are failing the American people by not going after these crooked officials....you know exactly what I'm talking about! "

    Rapy Slizbaum wrote on Mar 11, 2007 3:20 PM:

    " I cry every night I think of my dead son. He died for nothing. This war is a crime and Bush the man behind it should be sentenced for it. "

    Turtle wrote on Mar 11, 2007 3:23 PM:

    " Y'all should move to China where things go smoother and the leaders kill or lockup their enemies. "

    Wilma wrote on Mar 11, 2007 3:29 PM:

    " Im speechless "

    deepharbor wrote on Mar 11, 2007 5:12 PM:

    " I encourage all Republicans to reregister as independents, I've been a Republican for 30 years but intend to reregister. I hate to do it but I'll hold my nose and vote for the Democratic ticket, yuck, Bush has taken the Republican party into the sewer and left it there. "

    to Hank wrote on Mar 12, 2007 4:09 PM:

    " Clinton was tried in a court. The court is called Congress. Clinton was acquitted of the charges of perjury and obstruction of justice by the House of Representatives. Get over it and assign some blame to this current scoundrel ridden administration. "


    *Member ID:
    *Password:
      Forgot Your Password?
     

    Not already registered?
    Register Now

    Sponsors