" It appears that Don Bright has turned against the Fincher Family, "

" Several months ago when this issue was a hot topic, this blog was filled with comments. Now no one cares about it anymore. I wonder what the "irreconcilable differences" were. Perhaps Wayne didn't like getting told by his lawyer his case for appeal is not good and he's going to spend some time in prison. It's funny his own lawyer is in jail now too. All you have to do is search the internet on Stilley's name and you'll see all the stuff he's been into. And how has Don Bright turned against Wayne? Haven't heard about that...do tell. "

" “The plaintiff must show that he himself is injured by the challenged action of the defendant. The injury may be indirect, see United States v. SCRAP, 412 U.S. 669, 688, 93 S.Ct. 2405, 2416, 37 L.Ed.2d 254 (1973), but the complaint must indicate that the injury is indeed fairly traceable to the defendant’s acts or omissions. Simon v. Eastern Ky. Welfare Rights Org., 426 U.S. 26, 41-42, 96 S.Ct. 1917, 1925-1926, 48 L.Ed.2d 450 (1976); O’Shea v. Littelton, 414 U.S. 488, 498, 94 S.Ct. 669, 677, 38 L.Ed2d 674 (1974); Linda R. S. v. Richard D., 410 U.S. 614, 617, 93 S.Ct. 1146, 1148, 35 L.Ed.2d 536 (1973).” Vil. of Arlington Hts. v. Metro Housing Dev., 429 U.S. 252, 262. “Component parts of every crime are the occurrence of a specific kind of injury or loss, somebody’s criminality as source of the loss, and the accused’s identity as the doer of the crime; the first two elements are what constitutes the concept of “corpus delecti.” U.S. v. Shunk, 881 F.2d 917, 919 C.A. 10 (Utah). "Most American courts take the view that the phrase "corpus delecti" includes first, the fact of an injury or a loss and secondly, the fact of somebody's criminality (in contrast e.g. to accident) as the cause of the injury or loss." United States. v. Echeles, 222 F.2d 144, 155 (C.A. 10th Cir Ill.). "

" "On the contrary, we share the view most American courts that the phrase "corpus delecti"includes but two elements: first, the fact of an injury or loss; and secondly, the fact of somebody's criminality as the cause of the injury or loss." French v. United States, 232 F.2d 736 738, (C.A. 5th Cir. La.). "To paraphrase one of the leading cases: 'Most American courts take the view that the phrase "corpus delecti" includes first, the fact of an injury or a loss and secondly, the fact of somebody's criminality (in contrast e.g. to accident) as the cause of the injury or loss...' Manning v. United States, 10 Cir., 215 F.2d 945, at page 947; United States v. Echeles, 7 Cir., 1955, 222 F.2d 144; United States v. Di Orio, 3 Cir., 1940, 150 F.2d 938; George v. United States, 1942, 75 U.S.App.D.C. 197, 125 F.2d 559, 563; United States v. Markman, 2 Cir., 1952, 193 F.2d 574, 576." Sandez v. United States, 239 F.2d 239, 244 (C.A. 9th Cir. Calif.). "

" Standing is the same wherever you go, the important elements are (1) the violation of a right; and (2) injury. The only "authority" one should need is to look at the Declaration of Independence for the only reason for the establishment of an American government: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed..." "

" free, a.; {ME. free, freo; AS. freo, frio, frig, free.} 1. (a) not under the control of some other person or some arbitrary power; able to act or think without compulsion or arbitrary restriction; having liberty; independent; (b) characterized by or resulting from liberty. 2. (a) having, or existing under a government that does not impose arbitrary restrictions on the right to speak, assemble, petition, vote, etc.; having political liberty; as a free people; (b) not under control of a foreign government. 3. able to move in any direction; not held, as in chains, etc.; not kept from motion; loose. 4. not held or confined by a court, the police, etc.; acquitted. 5. not held or burdened by obligations, debts, discomforts, etc.; unhindered; unhampered. 6. not confined to the usual rules or patterns; not limited by convention or tradition...... - Webster's New Twentieth Century Dictionary 2nd Ed. (1983) "

" “Component parts of every crime are the occurrence of a specific kind of injury or loss, somebody’s criminality as source of the loss, and the accused’s identity as the doer of the crime; the first two elements are what constitutes the concept of “corpus delecti.” every. All of a collection or aggregate number..." Ballentine's Law Dictionary, page 423. "EVERY. Each one of all..." Black's Law Dictionary, 4th Ed., page 655. The Cambridge online dictionary also defines "every" as "all". I think that settles it, honest people will agree "every" means "all". Just for fun though, go ask your attorney friends to explain why "In every criminal trial" does not mean "In every criminal trial". Welcome to legal land, the fantasy world attorneys, bureaucrats and politicians live in. In legal land, such principals and legal requirements do not apply when they get in the way of a bureaucrat stealing your time, money and energy. It's all public relations so men and women incapable of offering their services on a voluntary basis (government) can continue cageing killing and stealing under the guise of "protecting" their victims. "

" A political prisoner is someone held in prison or otherwise detained, perhaps under house arrest, because their ideas or image are deemed by a government to either challenge or threaten the authority of the state. It may be a prisoner of conscience, deprived of freedom of speech. In many cases, political prisoners are imprisoned with no legal veneer directly through extrajudicial processes. However, it also happens that political prisoners are arrested and tried with a veneer of legality, where false criminal charges, manufactured evidence, and unfair trials are used to disguise the fact that an individual is a political prisoner. This is common in situations which may otherwise be decried nationally and internationally as a human rights violation and suppression of a political dissident. A political prisoner can also be someone that has been denied bail unfairly, denied parole when it would reasonably have been given to a prisoner charged with a comparable crime, or special powers may be invoked by the judiciary. Particularly in this latter situation, whether an individual is regarded as a political prisoner may depend upon subjective political perspective or interpretation of the evidence. "

" Did this man use those weapons against anyone ? Where`s the severity of the crime ? The law enforcement would do much better if they was chasing off illegals. "

" Prison population statistics As of 2006, it is estimated that at least nine million people are currently imprisoned worldwide. [2] It is believed that this number is likely to be much higher, in view of general under-reporting and a lack of data from various countries, especially authoritarian regimes. Since the beginning of the 1990s, the prison population in most countries has increased significantly [citation needed]. In absolute terms, the United States currently has the largest inmate population in the world, with more than 2 million [3] in prison and jails even though violent crime and property crime have been declining since the 1990s according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics. [4] In 2002, both Russia and China also had prison populations in excess of 1 million [2] [5]. "

" Pray tell, my brother, Why do politicians kill and make war? Is it for glory; for things, for beliefs, for hatred, for power? Yes, but more, because they can. "