Wal-Mart Gives Up On ILC

Company Says Controversy 'Manufactured'

Last updated Friday, March 16, 2007 10:11 PM CDT in Business

By Anita French
The Morning News

    Wal-Mart Stores Inc. withdrew Friday its application with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. to open an industrial loan bank, apparently in response to widespread opposition.

    The Bentonville-based retailer said in a news release that its action follows FDIC's decision in January to extend the moratorium on a number of industrial loan corporation applications.

    "Unlike dozens of prior ILC applications, Wal-Mart's has been surrounded by manufactured controversy since it was submitted nearly two years ago. At no stage did we intend to use the ILC to establish branch banking operations as critics have suggested -- we simply sought to reduce credit and debit card transaction costs," said Jane Thompson, financial services president for Wal-Mart, in the release. "Since the approval process is now likely to take years rather than months, we decided to withdraw our application to better focus on other ways to serve customers."

    An industrial loan corporation is a type of bank that commercial businesses can operate for specific purposes, such as processing payments. Wal-Mart could save millions of dollars by processing its own financial transactions, the company has said.

    Wal-Mart made its application to open an ILC in Utah in July 2005. Since then, the FDIC received more than 1,500 letters and comments in opposition to the application. Among the critics were commercial bankers, politicians and consumer groups.

    The controversy caused FDIC to extend by one year a moratorium on considering ILC applications, it said in January. The decision put on hold applications not only from Wal-Mart, but also from Home Depot Inc., DaimlerChrysler AG and American Pioneer. It also stirred Congress to consider legislation that would prohibit such companies from owning industrial loan corporations.

    Critics say the growth of ILCs risks blurring the line between banking and commerce, concentrating assets in the hands of a few big companies and stifling competition. They also expressed concern that Wal-Mart opening an industrial bank would lead to it starting a commercial bank in the future.

    The Independent Community Bankers of America in a news release Friday cheered Wal-Mart's decision to withdraw its ILC application.

    "A Wal-Mart bank -- owned by the world's largest commercial retailer -- is the poster child for what could go wrong and would pose significant risk to the safety and soundness of the Deposit Insurance Fund and to the stability of our financial and economic system by breaching the long-standing wall between banking and commerce," said Camden R. Fine, ICBA president and CEO.

    Wal-Mart has denied it wants to get into commercial banking, but fears were raised again this week when Rep. Paul Gillmor, R-Ohio, a leader of congressional efforts to draw a strict line between commerce and banking, released a Wal-Mart e-mail detailing lease terms with banks that rent space for branches inside hundreds of Wal-Mart stores.

    The lease terms in the e-mail said Wal-Mart can offer future services including mortgages, consumer loans, home equity loans, investment and insurance products and any other type of service or product that Wal-Mart might develop.

    A Wal-Mart spokesman said at the time that the e-mail was nothing new and reflected similar language it has used in leases with outside banks for at least five years. But Thompson noted in Friday's news release that the company would "continue to introduce new products and services that champion those who deserve convenient, lower-priced financial services."

    Gillmor said the lease terms showed Wal-Mart is secretly planning to move into retail banking despite assurances to the contrary in testimony last year to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

    Also, American Banker posted on its Web site Friday that Wal-Mart is expected to announce a "separate push to engage in other financial service activities, such as consumer lending, that do not require a bank charter."

    Wal-Mart spokesman Kevin Gardner did not confirm or deny the report.

    "When we have news in this area, we'll be happy to announce, but we're already saving customers $245 million annually through the basic money services we provide, such as check cashing and money transfers," he said in an e-mail to The Morning News.

    Wal-Mart Watch of Washington, a union-backed group that has been critical of Wal-Mart over its employee benefits and policies, also opposed the company's ILC application. In an e-mail Friday, Wal-Mart Watch Executive Director David Nassar said Wal-Mart's withdrawal of its application was a "victory for consumers."

    "We continue to have serious concerns about Wal-Mart's desire to get into financial services such as mortgages and payday lending," Nassar said.

    -- The Associated Press contributed to this article.

    Timeline:

    July 18, 2005: Wal-Mart files application with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. to open an industrial loan corporation bank in Utah.

    Feb. 23, 2006: FDIC announces it will hold public hearings on Wal-Mart's application.

    July 28, 2006: FDIC announces a six-month moratorium on all new ILC applications, including Wal-Mart's.

    Jan. 29, 2007: Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., and Rep. Paul Gillmor, R-Ohio, introduce H.R. 698, prohibiting new ILCs.

    Jan. 31, 2007: FDIC announces a 12-month extension of ILC moratorium.

    March 16, 2007: Wal-Mart withdraws its application.

    Reader Comments (8 comment(s))


    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsibility of their authors. The Morning News does not review comments before their publication, nor do we guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by our comment policy. If you see a comment that violates our policy, please notify the web editor.

    rick wrote on Mar 17, 2007 9:31 AM:

    " thanks to media. awareness helps. three cheers. oppose wm . stop wm. shut wm. "

    ShopLocal wrote on Mar 17, 2007 9:33 AM:

    " Why do people shop there, is it really that much cheaper. With a little effort and shopping around the same prices can be found elsewhere. Walmart causes so much trouble for local communities, people need to be more responsible with their spending power and shop local "

    Too bad wrote on Mar 17, 2007 10:13 AM:

    " It's unfair that the government "protects" the banking industry, and allows others to be eaten alive. I would have liked to see Wal-Mart get into banking... I'm tired of paying 25% interest rates to scum-sucking bankers. "

    Hmmmm wrote on Mar 17, 2007 11:45 AM:

    " Maybe if Wally world didn't have such a poor track record dealing with the truth they might not have had such opposition. "

    The banking industry and it's lobbyists wrote on Mar 17, 2007 11:53 AM:

    " were too afraid that WalMart would revolutionize the industry with a well-tuned organization philosophy that they cried to their puppets on both sides of that sad aisle. Those jealous of WalMart and those filled with idiotic hatred towards them keep giving our society a reason to laugh out loud and to remind us that both our high schools and colleges are failing us. "

    Save the Bankers wrote on Mar 18, 2007 12:15 PM:

    " Everyone hates WMT for killing the little mom and pop stores and ignores the lower prices. Everyone hates the WMT because they pay workers low wages for what is essentially unskilled to low skilled labor. To raise their wages ignores the real problem. They should be encouraged to educate their workers. This would benefit WMT and the country and force WMT to pay the workers more to keep them. They lowered frictional costs for retail stores. They would have done the same for credit transactions. Those EDUCATED bankers obviously lobbied to stop it. "

    To wrote on Mar 18, 2007 1:59 PM:

    " You have proven that their is hope for our education system! I am definately eating different mushrooms that most of the anti-walmart crowd. My mushrooms are not filled with Whine and Jealousy. My mushrooms help me understand that WalMart is a company that is in the business to make money. They are to find the best qualified worker for the lowest price possible..as much as it is my responsibility to barter my pay salary for the highest possible wage available. My mushrooms also help me realize that if I do not like the quality of employment by a company that I have every right to leave at anytime for whatever reason. I understand that WalMart can do the same for their reasons. My mushrooms help give me the ability to disengage from WalMart if I need to and not hold a grudge against them cause they didn't act how I had wanted them to act. Not one of the whiners gave a valid reason for not allowing WMT to enter the banking system...NOT ONE! But you all surely did provide a LOT of drama yourselves. Hopefully there are more "Save the Bankers" in the area to give intelligent thought processes. Have a wonderful day eating your mushrooms, I will continue eating mine! "

    That To was supposed to be to Save the Bankers wrote on Mar 18, 2007 2:01 PM:

    " But the format didn't take the "Save the Bankers". "


    *Member ID:
    *Password:
      Forgot Your Password?
     

    Not already registered?
    Register Now

    Sponsors