Group Seeks To Put Gay Foster Parenting Ban On Ballot

Last updated Tuesday, June 12, 2007 8:52 PM CDT in News

By Rob Moritz
THE MORNING NEWS

    LITTLE ROCK — The Christian conservative group that successfully led the drive for Arkansas’ constitutional amendment banning gay marriage will push for a ballot initiative to limit who can adopt or foster children in the state, its leader said Tuesday.

    Arkansas voters should have the opportunity to vote on whether gay people and unmarried couples who live together should be allowed to adopt children or serve as foster parents, said Jerry Cox, executive director of the Arkansas Family Council.

    The group planned to formally announce its intentions today.

    Cox said his organization is drafting a measure that would impose such a ban and plans to submit it to the attorney general’s office for approval this summer. The attorney general must certify the popular name and ballot title of ballot issues before their supporters can begin petition drives to get them on the general election ballot.

    “This is not anything different than what we’ve been talking about since the Legislature failed to pass a bill during the recent session,” Cox said, referring to Senate Bill 959, which passed the Senate but stalled in a House committee.

    If the measure’s name and ballot title are approved, the Family Council would then have until July 7, 2008, to collect the necessary signatures to get the proposal on the November 2008 general election ballot.

    The proposal being developed would be similar to Senate Bill 959, Cox said. Several versions have been written and no decision has been made on whether the measure would be a proposed constitutional amendment or an initiated act, he said.

    To get a proposed constitutional amendment on the 2008 ballot would require the signatures of 77,468 registered voters. A proposed initiated act would need 61,874 signatures of registered voters to qualify for the ballot, according to the secretary of state’s office.

    An initiated act could be changed by the Legislature with a three-fourths majority. A constitutional amendment, however, could only be changed by a vote of the people.

    Rita Sklar, executive director of the Arkansas Chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union, said Tuesday her organization will fight any attempt to implement such a ban, as it did during the legislative session.

    Sklar said such a measure would only serve to harm the children of the state, which she said is in desperate need of foster parents.

    “Our foster care service is in no better condition than it was during the session. No fewer children need homes than during the session,” she said.

    Sklar added that she did not think Arkansans “want to see the government meddling in the question of adoption and families.”

    Senate Bill 959 was filed in response to a June 2006 state Supreme Court decision upholding a lower court ruling that struck down a state regulation banning gays from becoming foster parents.

    Pulaski County Circuit Judge Timothy Fox ruled in 2004 that in imposing the ban the state Child Welfare Review Board exceeded its authority granted by the Legislature. After the ruling, the state stopped asking prospective foster parents about their sexual orientation.

    Attorney General Dustin McDaniel’s office has already certified three proposed constitutional amendments, including one by former Sharp County Quorum Court member Marvin Coosey that would lengthen the terms of county officials from two years to four years.

    The attorney general also has also certified two proposals by former state Rep. Charles Ormond of Morrilton. One would create a state commission to oversee expanded gambling in Arkansas.

    The other would set four-year terms for county officials; allow state senators to serve up to three four-year terms instead of two four-year terms; allow state representatives to serve up to three four-year terms instead of three two-year terms; and limit state Supreme Court justices and state Court of Appeals judges to two six-year terms in office.

    Reader Comments (3 comment(s))


    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsibility of their authors. The Morning News does not review comments before their publication, nor do we guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by our comment policy. If you see a comment that violates our policy, please notify the web editor.

    BCR wrote on Jun 13, 2007 8:58 AM:

    " The only reason I regret moving here... The holier-than-thou attitude of some of the people who live here. This is unfair to the kids who deserve a good home. I'm not gay, but everyone has the right to live the way they want. The sponsors of this bill need to get together and move to Utah. "

    ace-dragoon wrote on Jun 16, 2007 9:55 PM:

    " It's really sad that something this needs to take place but in the reality of the seditious and factious ACLU it is in fact a need. Most people do not realize the violent harm being caused a child adopted by homosexual people. Homosexuals cannot reproduce and based on that alone it is a pernicious situation to put any child into. What if we just replaced heterosexuals with homosexuals. What kind of country would this be. There would be no future without the family and heterosexual relationships. I commend all those pushing forward with this issue. "

    posaunist wrote on Jul 10, 2007 7:38 PM:

    " Apparently you can't post any viewpoint on these comment forums. This'll be my second posting of such a reply. I'm not surprised to see such bigoted ignorance such as that of ace-dragoon's statement. In fact, if we are to pay any attention to the results of research into this very topic, we'd see that the sexual orientation of parents has absolutely no effect on a child. It is nothing more than fear-driven ignorance that fuels such comments. How can a serious adult suggest putting any meaning into the imagining of a majority of homosexuals? First of all, homosexuality occurs in many species outside of the human species. Second, that percentage is a relatively stable percentage driven by what are as of now unclear causes. Why do straight people usually adopt? Oh yes, it's often because they can't have children of their own! Regardless of your religious beliefs, don't let religious dogma blind you of the facts of reality. We have for too long allowed religion to stifle progress and persecute people for something that happens to be written as undesired in a two thousand year old text. It is time we treat each other with respect, and let science and not superstition be the judge of nature. "


    *Member ID:
    *Password:
      Forgot Your Password?
     

    Not already registered?
    Register Now

    Sponsors