Study: '06 Temperature Increases Support Warming Theory

Republican Skeptic Calls Climate Change A "Fad"

Last updated Tuesday, July 24, 2007 7:53 PM CDT in News

By John Lyon
THE MORNING NEWS

    LITTLE ROCK -- Above-normal temperatures recorded last year in Arkansas and across the nation are evidence of global warming, according to a new study released Tuesday.

    The average mean temperature recorded at Fort Smith Regional Airport in 2006 was 64.1 degrees, or 2.9 degrees above the 30-year norm of 61.2 degrees at that location, according to the study by U.S. Public Interest Research Group, a consumer advocacy group with offices in Boston and Washington.

    At Little Rock National Airport, the average mean temperature last year was 64.5 degrees, or 2.4 degrees above normal for that location.

    The study drew upon data from 255 weather stations in all 50 states and Washington, D.C., to compare recent temperatures with "normal" temperatures, or average temperatures for the 30 years spanning 1971-2000.

    Nationally, 2006 was the second-warmest year on record and the summer of 2006 was the second-warmest summer on record for the 48 contiguous states, according to the study.

    The average temperature last year was at least 0.5 percent above normal at 87 percent of the locations studied. The same was true for average temperatures over the period of 2000-06.

    "This unseasonably warm weather is part of a long-term trend toward rising temperatures and extreme weather events resulting from global warming," the creators of the study concluded.

    "This study should prove once again that global warming is happening in the U.S. and here in Arkansas," said Glen Hooks, spokesman for the Sierra Club of Arkansas.

    Hooks said on Tuesday the temperature changes cited in the study may not seem like much, but in terms of the global climate, a change of a few degrees is significant.

    "You kick over one domino here in the complex web of life, when you're talking about the environment, and you can really cause some serious changes. If we don't reverse those changes, we're really going to see some significant difference," he said.

    This spring, the Legislature enacted a bill to create a state Global Warming Commission. The 21-member commission, most of whose members have yet to be appointed, will study the issue of climate change and recommend actions for the state to take.

    State Rep. Roy Ragland, R-Marshall, abstained when the legislation came up for a vote in the House. Ragland said Tuesday he was "not too shook up" when told of the study by U.S. Public Interest Research Group.

    "Back in 1975, the same community of scientists and so on was saying we were about to experience climate change in the opposite direction," Ragland said. "We were about to experience a terrific cooling of the Earth. I think it's kind of like hula hoops and miniskirts -- it's a fad."

    The climate study comes during what so far has been an unseasonably cool summer for Arkansas. The temperature in Fort Smith so far this month has been 2.1 degrees below normal, according to the National Weather Service.

    Hooks said it is long-term trends, not fluctuations from month to month, that show the effects of climate change.

    "If you look at the overall trend, you see an unmistakable pattern of increase," he said. "The past 35 years have all been among the warmest on record for the U.S., and if you want to look at it worldwise, 11 of the last 12 years rank among the warmest years in the instrumental record of global surface temperature."

    Ragland said global warming has occurred throughout the history of the Earth.

    "'Does that prove that man's causing it?' would be my question, and I don't think so," he said.

    The National Resources Defense Council last week released the results of a survey indicating that nearly 70 percent of voters in Arkansas' 4th Congressional District consider global warming a "serious problem."

    The 4th District was the only Arkansas congressional district surveyed by the council.

    Reader Comments (4 comment(s))


    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsibility of their authors. The Morning News does not review comments before their publication, nor do we guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by our comment policy. If you see a comment that violates our policy, please notify the web editor.

    cybertech wrote on Jul 24, 2007 10:46 PM:

    " They just are never going to get the real picture are they? lol I love how two things were implied here by omission. 1. That CO2 is the major driving factor, and 2. That its all man made. Both are wrong in the extreme. Look if we cut the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere by 75% next year, it still would not totally halt the warming trend! Why? Because there are many other factors at play. I said it before and I will say it over and over, if you are listening the IPCC and anyone that follows them, well sorry to say you are being misinformed in a major way. What I find interesting is that the time before the "Little Ice Age" Average mean temperatures were up to 4 degrees warmer than that are today, and interestingly not only did people fair well on many levels, there was, ummmmmmmmmmmm also way less CO2 in the atmosphere! My oh my what could have ever instigated such a warming trend? Increased solar output? Fluctuations of the magnetosphere? Other? Oh but wait, no, no, no, no...........contd "

    cybertech wrote on Jul 24, 2007 10:55 PM:

    " contd................ it must have been all the flatulence of all the people and animals of the time, yep thats it!!!!! lol Oh wait I know, lets all go down and buy lots of ice, and we will launch it into the sun to cool it off! Alarmism is fun is it not? lol Give me a break, time to come back to reality and start focusing on the REAL cause or causes, and start showing a bit of common sense. Clean air, clean water, it all cool. What we have to get into our heads though is this is something that we cant STOP in totality. So lets just focus on the clean air and water thing, and let nature run its course and I am certain you will see that, short of the sun burning up all its fuel and expanding and burning up the earth, or some other REALISTIC calamity, everything is going to be fine, until then stay inside when its to hot. "

    pgjohnw wrote on Jul 25, 2007 8:53 AM:

    " 30 years?? they look at temperature ranges for 30 years and say this proves there is global warming??why are we even funding this study? didnt al gore say that globakl warming is real and there is no need for discussion? well i'm sorry, but not everyone is spoonfed thier opinions buy the media and the environmentalist. i am so sick and tired of everything proving global warming. the temp gets hot-global warming. too much snow or too little snow-global warming, a hurricane hits florida-global warming. my sone poops in his diaper- global warming, enough!!!! "

    lonestar60 wrote on Jul 26, 2007 7:02 AM:

    " Ok now we pick and choose the data we like to support our forgone conclusion. Can't use 2004 because it was wet and cool similar, 2005 was normal, but wait - let's use 2006 because it was warmer than average. Of course they ignore the non-existent hurricane data for 2006 but let's not let any facts get in the way of our conclusions. Also this is brought to by the US Public Interest group who is historically known for manipulating data and statistics to pursue their own agenda. Cybertech has it right - focus on the things we can influence because the weather and climate are going to do what they want to do "


    *Member ID:
    *Password:
      Forgot Your Password?
     

    Not already registered?
    Register Now

    Sponsors