Beaver Water District Releases Watershed Map

Map Part Of Program To Educate Community Leaders

Last updated Sunday, January 13, 2008 5:35 PM CST in News

By Brandon Marcello
THE MORNING NEWS

    ROGERS -- The debate on legislating what can be done in Beaver Lake's watersheds has cooled, but protecting the watersheds is still a hot topic for the Beaver Water District.

    The district, partnered with Audubon Arkansas, has produced a new watershed map designed to educate community leaders and policymakers, said Amy Wilson, public affairs director with the Beaver Water District.

    Production of the new map -- which includes seven subwatersheds on the east side of Northwest Arkansas' larger cities -- comes after Beaver Water District staff and supporters' attempts to get cities and counties in the region to pass ordinances to better protect Beaver Lake.

    Progress in the last two years, however, has been hard to come by for the district. Property owners near the lake were against a draft ordinance in Benton County in 2006 that would have disallowed new development inside riparian buffers. The buffers were defined as land within 150 feet of streams, tributaries and dry creek beds.

    The measures failed to gain adequate support, and the topic soon died.

    The release of the new map last week directed to policymakers is not meant to heat up debate again, said Bob Morgan, manager of environmental quality for the Beaver Water District.

    "Our authority is to produce water," he explained. "Our authority is not land management ... The only way we can impose regulation is through our ability to encourage other jurisdictions to promote some ordinances."

    Morgan said the district is no longer proposing ordinances to county and city government entities.

    The new map contains information on protecting the district's seven watersheds, including the West Fork-White River subwatershed that is designated an impaired stream because of high turbidity levels and excessive silt loads, according to a study by the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality.

    Runoff from construction sites near the watershed causes the excessive silt, then affects Beaver Lake, said Dabney Brannon, regional conservation manager for Audubon Arkansas.

    "The dirtier the water, the more work has to be done to treat it," Brannon said. "That's why we did this map. People need to know that what they're doing affects us and the habitat in the watersheds. One thing I always like to say is that as Beaver Lake goes, so goes the Northwest Arkansas community. We all want to have a good community and good water quality is a big part of that."

    The southern section of Beaver Lake, Morgan said, had a eutrophic, or nutrient-rich, value in August. Water quality is measured in three classifications -- oligotrophic, mesotrophic and eutrophic. Eutrophic, according to values obtained during an August excursion on the lake, signifies high biological productivity. Those conditions, considered the highest at the headwaters in Beaver Lake, allow for better algae growth.

    "Obviously, when it's like that the lake has more opportunities to have contaminants," Morgan said.

    Most pollution in the lake is caused by runoff, Morgan said. The Beaver Water District can help curb that, he said, with buffer zones.

    Still, no legislation has been proposed since the failed attempts in 2006, Morgan said.

    "The Beaver Water District has some good points, but you just can't take property or limit the use of property without compensation," said Scott Borman, general manager of the Benton-Washington Regional Public Water Authority, which also draws water from Beaver Lake.

    "Protecting the watershed, yes, is a very good thing," Borman said. "You have to take baby steps to get it done. Education is the biggest place to start."

    AT A GLANCE

    Secchi Disc

    Thirty-five "community scientists" meet at the Prairie Creek Marina on Beaver Lake every August to conduct studies to measure the turbidity -- or clarity -- of the lake. The teams spread to different positions across the lake and drop a Secchi disk into the water. The disc, patterned in white and black, reflects light to the surface of the water as it descends into the lake. The longer the disc is visible as it drops, the better the clarity of the lake.

    Source: Dabney Brannon, Regional Conservation Manager For Audubon Arkansas

    Reader Comments (3 comment(s))


    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsibility of their authors. The Morning News does not review comments before their publication, nor do we guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by our comment policy. If you see a comment that violates our policy, please notify the web editor.

    tony wrote on Jan 14, 2008 5:46 AM:

    " This important issue of protecting our Lake cannot be allowed to just disappear by neglect Thank you Beaver water District The more people know & understand the lake the more they will support real measures to protect it. Joining the Association for Beaver Lake Environment (ABLE) @ able-ark.org is a way for individuals to help also. "

    bstrick wrote on Jan 14, 2008 9:02 AM:

    " The water quality of Beaver Lake is very important to all that live in NWA, But as a resident of the Beaver Lake shore line, I think that is wrong of any city, state, or government to tell us how we should use our land that we own. Most of us that live at the lake live here because we love the lake, and do not want to do anything to hurt or destroy the lake that we love. It's ok to educate the people of NWA but not to rule us like we are a bunch of 5th graders. "

    ROOTER wrote on Jan 14, 2008 11:14 AM:

    " Thanks to TMN for getting a quote from Scott Borman, general manager of a different water authority that takes water from the lake: "you can't just take property or limit the use of property without compensation". That's what Beaver Water District tried to do when they spent a lot of rate payers money and hired a PR firm to promote a confiscating ordinance that would have only affected Benton County, and would have a very neglible affect on the watershed, but a terrible affect on the rights of property owners. Looking at their map, the stream that they call impaired isn't even in Benton County. I believe ABLE blindly supported the Ordinance in some sort of alliance with Beaver Water District. "


    *Member ID:
    *Password:
      Forgot Your Password?
     

    Not already registered?
    Register Now

    Sponsors