Unemployment Benefits Extended
Last updated Saturday, June 14, 2008 5:56 PM CDT in News
By Tony BattM
The Morning News
WASHINGTON - After failing in its first attempt, the House passed a bill last week to extend unemployment benefits.
The legislation, which passed on a 274-137 vote, would make the jobless eligible for benefits for 13 weeks beyond the 26 weeks already allowed for all states.
On its first attempt, the House voted 279-144 for the extension. That was three votes shy of a two-thirds majority, which was required because the extension came to the House floor under an expedited procedure.
Advocates of the extension cited the surging unemployment rate of 5.5 percent, and said unemployed workers desperately need money to look for a job and meet other financial obligations.
The White House argued the best way to help the unemployed would be to create "an environment that encourages job creation and to promote effective job training."
First District Reps. Marion Berry, D-Gillett; 4th District Rep. Mike Ross, D-Prescott; and 2nd District Rep. Vic Snyder, D-Little Rock, voted both times to extend unemployment benefits.
Third District Rep. John Boozman, R-Rogers, voted both times against the extension.
Oil company tax rebuffed
The Senate voted 51-43 to approve a tax on oil company profits, but the measure failed because 60 votes were required under Senate rules.
In addition to taxing profits which are more than 10 percent higher than a past average, the legislation would have rolled back about $17 billion in tax breaks for oil companies.
Supporters of the tax said oil companies should not be enjoying tax breaks and record profits when Americans are struggling to pay an average of $4 per gallon for gas.
Critics charged the tax would increase the cost of gasoline and ignore the need for domestic oil production in areas like the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
Sens. Blanche Lincoln and Mark Pryor, both D-Ark., voted to tax the oil companies.
Medicare bill blocked
Doctors face a 10.6 percent cut in Medicare payments and may refuse to see new patients unless Congress reaches a compromise by July 1.
The Senate voted 54-39 for a bill by Democrats to prevent the pay cut for physicians, but 60 votes were required to end the debate.
The bill calls for spending $19.8 billion over five years, but Democrats and Republicans disagree on how to pay for it.
Democrats want to slash privately-run Medicare Advantage programs, which offer more benefits at a lower cost but also are costlier for the government to reimburse.
A Republican alternative bill would have cut Medicaid, the health entitlement program for the poor.
Lincoln and Pryor voted for the Democratic version of the Medicare bill.
Tax breaks stalled
Despite receiving a 50-44 vote, a bill extending a variety of tax breaks, including a deduction for state sales taxes, stalled in the Senate.
Sixty votes were needed to advance the $55.5 billion bill, which includes new tax policies to help low-income families.
Supporters said the bill would provide much needed tax relief to Americans struggling with skyrocketing gas prices and mortgage foreclosures.
Opponents complained about offsets in the bill that would pay for the tax breaks. They charged the offsets would result in tax increases on other Americans.
Lincoln and Pryor voted for the extension of tax breaks.
Amtrak funding approved
Defying a veto threat, the House voted 311-104 to spend $14.4 billion to maintain the Amtrak passenger train service for five years.
The bill would require the identification of Amtrak's two least successful rail lines so private companies could take control of them.
Amtrak backers said trains remove 8 million cars from the highways each year, and eliminate the need for 50,000 fully loaded airline flights.
The White House said President Bush would veto the bill because it does not include "meaningful reforms in Amtrak's governance or operations."
Berry, Boozman, Ross and Snyder voted for Amtrak funding.
Reader Comments (2 comment(s))
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsibility of their authors. The Morning News does not review comments before their publication, nor do we guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by our comment policy. If you see a comment that violates our policy, please notify the web editor.
Not already registered?
calistoga1 wrote on Jun 15, 2008 5:56 AM: