Westeen Seeks Specifics Of Accomplice To Murder Charge
Last updated Tuesday, August 19, 2008 6:47 PM CDT in News
By The Morning News
FAYETTEVILLE - A man charged with being an accomplice to the murder of a Fayetteville couple wants a more detailed explanation from prosecutors of what they allege he did to merit the charge.
Jesse Westeen, 21, allegedly drove Gregory Christopher Decay to the apartment where Decay gunned down Kevin Barkley Jones and Kendall Rachell Rice, both 24, last year. Decay was convicted and sentenced to death.
Westeen's attorney, Tim Buckley, filed a motion Tuesday in Washington County Circuit Court asking for a bill of particulars.
"Mr. Westeen specifically needs to know what act or acts the state alleges that he personally committed or omitted regarding the episode which resulted in the death of the victims and what he did or did not otherwise do," according to the motion.
The felony information against Westeen says he drove "with the purpose of allowing a co-defendant to commit a crime," according to Buckley. He contends that description doesn't fall within the legal definition of being an accomplice to capital murder.
During Decay's murder trial, Prosecutors said Westeen drove Decay to the apartment then waited around the corner while Decay went in and killed Jones and Rice. When Decay came out, Westeen drove them away.
Prosecutors are not seeking the death penalty against Westeen. He does face life in prison if convicted. Trial is set for Sept. 22.
Reader Comments (5 comment(s))
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsibility of their authors. The Morning News does not review comments before their publication, nor do we guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by our comment policy. If you see a comment that violates our policy, please notify the web editor.
spare me wrote on Aug 20, 2008 1:02 PM:
samandlucy wrote on Aug 20, 2008 2:39 PM:
Then why are you so vehemently opposed to him asking the State to tell him exactly what they intend to introduce into evidence to prove the accomplice charge? "
spare me wrote on Aug 21, 2008 11:55 AM:


samandlucy wrote on Aug 20, 2008 10:27 AM: