Clinton Urges Arkansans To Take Historic Step
Last updated Saturday, October 25, 2008 7:16 PM CDT in News
By Peggy Harris
The Associated Press
PINE BLUFF -- Bill Clinton and leading Arkansas Democrats appealed Saturday to voters statewide to make national history by putting Barack Obama in the White House.
In typical Clinton fashion, the former president arrived late for the get-out-the-vote rally. But, also in Clinton style, he invigorated an already lively crowd of some 1,500 Obama supporters after they had attended a college homecoming parade.
“I can be very brief about this. Barack Obama is going to win this election,” Clinton said as applause and cheers drowned out his words. “And he’s going to win it well, big, and he’s going to win because he’s a good candidate, because he’s got a great vice presidential partner, because he’s got the best positions on the issues and because our country is in struggle.”
One after another Arkansas’ top Democrats took the stage to tout Obama’s credentials. Former U.S. Sens. David Pryor and Dale Bumpers, Sen. Mark Pryor, Rep. Mike Ross, Gov. Mike Beebe, former U.S. Transportation Secretary Rodney Slater, and former Gov. Jim Guy Tucker each said Arkansas and the country needs Obama to lead them.
A recent poll shows Obama trailing in Arkansas, which has not voted for a Democratic presidential candidate since Clinton’s re-election in 1996. Bush carried the state in 2000 and 2004. In the University of Arkansas poll, 51 percent of registered voters surveyed said they would vote for Republican John McCain while 36 percent said they support Obama.
Loyal to their former governor and first lady, Arkansas Democrats threw their support to Hillary Rodham Clinton in the primary, while the prospect of electing the first female president or putting the first African-American in the White House passionately divided Democrats around the country.
In an appeal to his wife’s die-hard supporters, Clinton told the crowd Saturday that she has been working just as hard for Obama as she did for herself in her own campaign.
Clinton said Obama has the leadership qualities needed to fix the country’s financial crisis and stop mortgage foreclosures so people can get credit again. The Illinois senator has the best healthcare plans and can bring an end to the Iraq war, reverse U.S. dependence on foreign oil, and reduce global warming, Clinton said.
Obama will win the Nov. 4 election, Clinton said, because of what the country has gone through under a Republican president for the last eight years.
“We got to see for most of President Bush’s term what would actually happen to America if the extreme right-wing philosophy that he and his allies in the Republican Party had advocated for the last 30 years were actually made real in the lives of the American people,” he said.
Academy award-winning actress Mary Steenburgen, a native Arkansan who also has a residence in the state, appeared on stage. She did not address the crowd, but Clinton said she had asked him to urge them to vote against an Arkansas ballot proposal that would ban gays from being foster parents or adopting children.
Clinton and the state Democratic powerhouses began their two-day campaign in North Little Rock on Friday. After the Pine Bluff event, they headed to Jonesboro for a closing rally.
Reader Comments (136 comment(s))
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsibility of their authors. The Morning News does not review comments before their publication, nor do we guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by our comment policy. If you see a comment that violates our policy, please notify the web editor.
Robert5000 wrote on Oct 25, 2008 7:49 PM:
But what about Barack Obama? The New York Times in its endorsement of Barack Obama said: Mr. Obama has met challenge after challenge, growing as a leader and putting real flesh on his early promises of hope and change. He has shown a cool head and sound judgment. We believe he has the will and the ability to forge the broad political consensus that is essential to finding solutions to this nations problems.
In the same time, Senator John McCain of Arizona has retreated farther and farther to the fringe of American politics, running a campaign on partisan division, class warfare and even hints of racism. His policies and worldview are mired in the past. His choice of a running mate so evidently unfit for the office was a final act of opportunism and bad judgment that eclipsed the accomplishments of 26 years in Congress. "
Robert5000 wrote on Oct 25, 2008 7:49 PM:
Senator John McCain is a respected 72 year old American warrior, but he is on a path whose slope, however gentle, is downward. On the contrary Senator Barack Obama is an intelligent, articulate, and insightful 47 year old American whose best years lie ahead of him; a man who graduated near the top of his class at Harvard Law School and was president of its Law Review; a man who understands and respects the American constitution because he was an instructor of constitutional law for 12 years at the University of Chicago Law School; a man familiar with the American legislative process because he served 3 terms as an Illinois State Senator and for the past 4 years as a US Senator; a man acquainted with Washington but one who also brings fresh ideas and a passion for bringing about important and necessary changes in Washington. Senator Barack Obama is a man of equanimity, keen intellect, clear vision, sound judgment, and steadfast determination. He is the man America needs today, and also the man who can lead America tomorrow. It is time for Americans everywhere to cast their ballots for Barack Obama. It is time for Barack Obama to become Americas 44th president. "
cybertech wrote on Oct 25, 2008 8:49 PM:
He's one heck of a speaker when prompted but out of the box, sorry, he is just not ready yet in my opinion.
I will not say that McCain is the 100% best, but sorry again in my opinion and given the only two viable options, he's better than "the one", lol.
My opinion being based upon my research into the truth of everything and not buying into much of what the media or polls say.
Did we have better choices in the primaries?? Absolutely! Now we are down to the lesser of two evils unfortunately, and again sorry but "the one", lol, is just not quite ready yet. "
aijcadd wrote on Oct 25, 2008 10:21 PM:
cybertech wrote on Oct 25, 2008 11:27 PM:
Do you really think that by taxing corporate business and anyone that makes over $250 grand a year that the lower classes arent going to get punched even harder than they are now? If you dont believe so then you are deluding yourself.
For instance say Obama makes it in and begins to tax say big oil companies, and yes I agree that they make to much already, but here is the deal, so the oil companies are getting taxed more, which in turn cuts into their profit margin, how do you think they will make that loss up??? If you guessed by padding the costs on to the consumer you guessed correctly. The same will go with any other corporation or industry.
Contd........... "
cybertech wrote on Oct 25, 2008 11:34 PM:
Of course there is double taxation! They take taxes out of every paycheck you earn to the tune of approx 24%, every single payday, then at the end of the year when you file, very rarely do you see all that money back, in fact you will most likely pay in, like it or not when you dont get back all you paid in, or you pay in more at the end of the year, you just paid a second tax on your income as well as extra taxes on assets.
Now as to a Democratic Congress getting anything done?? LOL For the last 4 years the Dems have held the majority seat and as well have pushed more than their fair share of pork, and to this day not much has been done.
The current economic turmoil can likewise be traced back to do nothing greedy dems.
Contd........... "
cybertech wrote on Oct 25, 2008 11:44 PM:
Now just to be fair here I am not saying that there were not any republicans with their hands in the cookie jar as well as I am not foolish enough nor am I deluded enough to believe that they didnt, I know some did.
One question I want anyone to consider here is "how much government do you want in your personal business???".
Another thing is that if you have ever read up on socialism, marxism, or even communism, and history one proof of history is that none of them work and in fact in almost every country that employed such governmental tactics, they put people further in the poorhouse than we have ever experienced in the US short of the decade of the great depression.
I used to work with salesmen/women I got used to being able to spot a sales pitch almost instantly, there is an insincerity about a sales pitch that roars out through the rhetoric.
I just cant in good conscience vote for a candidate that believes that bigger government, socialized health care, socialized taxation, and one blatantly said that he wanted to "spread the wealth".
So I am left with the alternative. Which I think is better based upon what I have seen and read, and no not in the media or on blogs either. "
lifer66 wrote on Oct 26, 2008 3:35 AM:
brneyedgirl821 wrote on Oct 26, 2008 7:44 AM:
brneyedgirl821 wrote on Oct 26, 2008 7:46 AM:
BCR wrote on Oct 26, 2008 10:00 AM:
As to "big" government in our private business, do you enjoy having all of your e-mails, phone calls, bank accounts, and travel monitored by Homeland security? As for health care, well most Americans don't have ANY. Can't afford ANY. As for "Socialism", well, just how do you think our current tax system works? Remember, it was Bush's idea to invest Social Security in the stock market... "
brneyedgirl821 wrote on Oct 26, 2008 10:34 AM:
BCR wrote on Oct 26, 2008 11:37 AM:
brneyedgirl821 wrote on Oct 26, 2008 12:34 PM:
brneyedgirl821 wrote on Oct 26, 2008 12:41 PM:
Biden said that Obama would be tested in the first 6 months. I for one do not want our country to be a casualty of his training and learning experience. "
ozarks wrote on Oct 26, 2008 1:22 PM:
brneyedgirl821 wrote on Oct 26, 2008 2:38 PM:
mec wrote on Oct 27, 2008 6:41 AM:
There is a better way to decide the better presedential candidate and that is to evaluate where Mr. Obama came.
Illinois....a corrupt and bankrupt state. The governor, Blagoavich, is close to indictment because of his dealings with Tony Rezko. You remember the same guy Senator Obama is associated with and from whom he got his house and land. The state is financially bankrupt and cannot pay it's healthcare bills or any other bill due for that matter. Senator Obama voted to allow scissors to stab an unborn baby's brain. Senator Obama supported Illinois Senator "Turbin" Durbin and his position regarding our military'a "gullag" status. Senator Obama is associated and supportive of Chicago's Mayor Daley. The mayor initiated the no gun law in Chicago. It allows only criminals to possess guns, which has given Chicago the murder capital of the nation award. Chicago had more murders than New York and Los Angeles. Then, of course, Senator Obama's relationship with Ayers, the self professed and nonrepentent anti-american bomber. These are real issues that Americans better face before they vote for him. His campaign slogan should read..Change the US to what I am familiar with.. Illinois and Chicago!!! That's what we're going to get if he's voted in as president. "
BCR wrote on Oct 27, 2008 10:11 AM:
McCain's economic plan is basically an extension of Bush's. US companies have been taking these tax breaks for years and have used them to create stock dividends, not jobs. Obama wants to tie those breaks to real job creation.
McCain had a chance in the beginning. Palin has been his downfall. The thought of having pit-bull-sockermom-joe six-pack Sarah in charge makes me cringe. As for testing the new president... Are you aware of the fact that Russia is getting very cozy with Chavez in Venezuela? "
brneyedgirl821 wrote on Oct 27, 2008 11:42 AM:
BCR wrote on Oct 27, 2008 12:38 PM:
As for "redistribution of wealth", where do you think federal funds come from now? The tooth fairy? Do you enjoy Beaver Lake? That nice dam was built with federal money. Taxes that were collected, and "redistributed". Socialism at work. The Freeways you drive on were built with socialistic re-distributed funds. The unemployment check your getting was paid by re-distributed socialistic funds.
You should have stayed awake in Civics class. "
cybertech wrote on Oct 27, 2008 1:21 PM:
Do you really think that people like Akmadenijad (sp?), Chavez, and bullies like them can be bargained with?? Or that we havent even tried?? LOL
Why do people think that a congress that consist of any majority part could ever get anything meaningful accomplished much less even be considered Bipartisan???
My feeling is that Democracy has become broken in an extreme way. Why do both parties not nominate at least two of their respective parties to run in presidential elections to give we the people more of a choice???
Just some of the many things that weigh heavily on my mind these days.
One thing though that you may want to think about is will our next president, whomever that may be, end up being little more than a puppet for congress, or will they be an actual leader for the people??? Think about that before you cast your vote. "
apronstrings wrote on Oct 27, 2008 1:34 PM:
BCR wrote on Oct 27, 2008 1:51 PM:
As to being the commander-in-chief, That is his job. If I were the parent of a child serving in Iraq, and having seen the "farce" used by Cheney, the pentagon, and Bush to justify the war, I'd be wanting someone's hide. My son served in the Navy. There is no pride stronger than seeing your son in uniform. There is no sacrifice higher than defending AMERICAN freedom with your, or your child's life. Sending our children in to fight a civil war in another country under false pretenses is an atrocity, and NOT very Presidential. "
apronstrings wrote on Oct 27, 2008 2:40 PM:
Obama's promises sound too good to be true, because they are. If you want to redistribute your wealth, then give to your favorite charity, help the poor and needy and defend the rights of the defenseless, but do not force someone else to do it. We hold certain inaliable rights under our constitution and do not be decieved; these are exactly what is at stake. "
ozarks wrote on Oct 27, 2008 4:10 PM:
BCR wrote on Oct 27, 2008 4:56 PM:
As to the notion of Socialism and spreading the wealth, please read my previous post. IF YOU ARE EMPLOYED, OR HAVE EVER PAID ONE DOLLAR IN TAXES, YOU ARE PARTICIPATING IN A REDISTRIBUTION SYSTEM. That's how our Federal tax system works.
As for Mr McCain, how will he buy everyone's bad mortgage, bail out the financial system, give everyone health care, give everyone a stimulus check, lower everyone's taxes, give bigger tax breaks to companies, AND continue paying $10 billion a month in Iraq until who knows when WITHOUT raising taxes?
Oh yeah, he's republican. He'll just put it on his American Express Card. "
ozarks wrote on Oct 27, 2008 6:25 PM:
ozarks wrote on Oct 27, 2008 7:26 PM:
www.truthorfiction.rumors/o/obama-salute.htm or newsbuster.org or just google Obama Flag. That will give you plenty. "
adabell wrote on Oct 27, 2008 8:41 PM:
Obama has the redistribution of wealth in interivews and his plan includes not just redistributing the wealth in the US, but doubling our foreign aid.
As a leader in Illinois he voted present 129 times instead of yes or no.
Obama could not pass a security clearance for the FBI, but he would have access to all of our national secrets if Americans are lame enough to elect him.
Obamas inspiration, Rev Wright. His mother a socailist who while married and living in Indonesia refused to even dine with Americans saying they were not her people. Both father and step father were muslims, socialists, and unamerican. "
adabell wrote on Oct 27, 2008 9:03 PM:
I have seen the picture as I am sure many others can attest to as well. "
gary wrote on Oct 27, 2008 9:14 PM:
Of the several times I saw him,in the primaries where the Pledge was recited, I never saw him place his hand over his heart and say the pledge.
As a disabled vetern, I cannot vote for a person who WILL NOT, not cannot, but Will Not say the pledge of allegence and who continues to "Work with the 57 States!" THINK ABOUT THIS, there are 57 Muslims states in the United Nations.
This is a man who has said he will raise taxes. He has stated that where Civil Rights went wrong was that the wealth wasn't Redistributed.
This is the type of person you want to lead an already corrupt Government?
And for the record, I don't trust McCain either, this is why I'm looking to Vote for other canidates. We, as a country, need to get someone in office that isn't controled by the Democratic or Republician Parties. Also, if you want change lets start voting out the congressmen and women who have been party backers and not backing the intrest of the American People. "
adabell wrote on Oct 27, 2008 9:27 PM:
Have you checked out the Constitution Party. Chuck Baldwin is running and you can write in his name. You will probably agree with him on many points, I like him myself.
I am sticking with McCain because Obama would be such an insult to everything this country and our founding fathers stands for. They never intended for the government to control so much of our lives. "
cybertech wrote on Oct 28, 2008 3:56 AM:
Right now we are in the midst of some pretty bad economic times, with the majority of blame being placed on Bush and his administration, sure they played a part in it, but just a part, however there are some that are plenty naive as to say that its "ALL" Bushes fault and I have to laugh because those of us that still rely on truth and common sense know that not to be true.
Obama is a good oratorm especially so when prompted and knows how to use his voice, I will give him that. He comes off though to much as a salesperson working to get you to buy exactly what you dont want or need.
He has yet to explain just how he will fully fund the billions of dollars in policies that had planned because the "spread the wealth" idea is not going to cover even a small percentage.
Contd............ "
cybertech wrote on Oct 28, 2008 4:06 AM:
As a Commander In Chief, should he win, he is sadly lacking, and being former military, I am sorry but I would not salute the man after what I have seen and heard him do throughout this election.
His tax plans would be unfair, that is something that I have to agree with Constitutionally and based upon history.
Some say the Iraq war was wrong and unneeded, and I would disagree with them for reasons to long to state here.
There are a great number of things that bother me about Obama, most of all though the policies on his agenda that are socialist in nature.
I dont necessarily agree with what the current tax system has become, but this type of system is far from socialistic, nor is it a "spread the wealth" type system. The money that is paid in, in taxes is, supposed to be anyway, used to help run the government, pay for much needed services, for example Beaver Dam which provides clean hydroelectric for a portion of this region, to help pay for national infrastructure, etc...... thats not a socialist system by any stretch of the imagination.
Contd.............. "
cybertech wrote on Oct 28, 2008 4:13 AM:
I have been accused of being Republican, lol, and yes I do laugh when accused. Just so you all know I am registered Independent and am no one party affiliate.
In fact to vote based upon party, race, gender, or anything other than the best person for the job is not only ludicrous it is infantile.
My hope is that those that are voting in this election and elections to come are voting because they believe that the person they are voting for is the best person for the job and that they believe so because they have done their own research and not relied solely upon media outlets for their information.
If they are voting because of party affiliation, race, gender, etc.... then I am sorry but shame on them.
Its time to put, mainly party affiliation aside and vote, based on solid information, for the best person for the job.
Just some things to think about. "
mec wrote on Oct 28, 2008 6:12 AM:
Why on earth would people vote for such a dubious candidate? How desparate the dems are to get the WH back that they would support this obvious incompetent and dangerous man. Oh but wait, the dems backed the other dangerous and incompetent Clinton. "
amazed wrote on Oct 28, 2008 6:58 AM:
I am NOT ready for 4 more years and possibly 8 more of George W and Dicky... That is exactly what we would have if Johnny gets elected.. "
Gramps wrote on Oct 28, 2008 8:36 AM:
BCR wrote on Oct 28, 2008 9:33 AM:
As for the spread the wealth idea, McCain could have voted "no" on the bail out plan, but he didn't. What better opportunity was there for him to separate himself from Obama? Instead, he helped add $150 billion in pork.
You Republicans should have gotten your act together a lot sooner. "
ozarks wrote on Oct 28, 2008 11:25 AM:
listenandhear wrote on Oct 28, 2008 12:29 PM:
ozarks wrote on Oct 28, 2008 12:55 PM:
adabell wrote on Oct 28, 2008 2:28 PM:
So, clean out your ears, you seem to miss a lot.
When Obama was in Illinois he did belong to an organization that actually had socialist in the title. Obama has surrounded himself with extreme leftist since his childhood in Hawaii, this you can get from his own books. "
listenandhear wrote on Oct 28, 2008 2:49 PM:
adabell wrote on Oct 28, 2008 3:15 PM:
But is it were just to win the female vote, because females would vote for someone with ovaries, that is no more disgraceful then to vote for someone to vote for Obama because he is black
95% of blacks and many others like you who claim that is an advantage.
It is no less disgraceful than to choose Biden over Hillary who actually won the popular vote. "
adabell wrote on Oct 28, 2008 3:43 PM:
listenandhear wrote on Oct 28, 2008 3:48 PM:
Geez, between you and ozarks, I might as well not have an opinion, since you're so good at making it for me. "
mec wrote on Oct 28, 2008 3:57 PM:
Question: What is America 's first line of missile interceptor defense that protects the entire United States ?
Answer: 49th Missile Defense Battalion of Alaska National Guard.
Question: What is the ONLY National Guard unit on permanent active duty?
Answer: 49th Missile Defense Battalion of Alaska National Guard
Question: Who is the Commander in Chief of the 49th Missile Defense Battalion of Alaska National Guard?
Answer: Governor Sarah Palin, Alaska
Question: What U.S. governor is routinely briefed on highly classified military issues, homeland security, and counter terrorism?
Answer: Governor Sarah Palin, Alaska
Question: What U.S. governor has a higher classified security rating than either candidate of the Democrat Party?
Answer: Governor Sarah Palin, Alaska
According to the Washington Post, she first met with McCain in February, but nobody ever found out. This is a woman used to keeping secrets. She can be entrusted with our national security, because she already is.
Now you DO know! "
listenandhear wrote on Oct 28, 2008 4:01 PM:
ozarks wrote on Oct 28, 2008 5:33 PM:
ozarks wrote on Oct 28, 2008 5:40 PM:
adabell wrote on Oct 28, 2008 5:47 PM:
How do you think this happened? "
adabell wrote on Oct 28, 2008 6:01 PM:
Dreams From My Father." I chose my friends carefully,
"The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists." "
brneyedgirl821 wrote on Oct 28, 2008 6:57 PM:
mec wrote on Oct 28, 2008 8:32 PM:
Socialist and Marxist ties, pro stabbing brains of unborn innocent babies, his disgust for American values, support of anti-american "Turbin" Dick Durbin, his Islamist ties, corrupt money and real estate dealings with Tony Rezko etc, etc. If a republican candidate had only one of these problems the dems would be all over them.
Obama comes from a dirty, corrupt and bankrupt state. Why does anyone want him to rule American? "
adabell wrote on Oct 28, 2008 8:57 PM:
brneyedgirl821 wrote on Oct 29, 2008 6:35 AM:
sodapop wrote on Oct 29, 2008 9:34 AM:
listenandhear wrote on Oct 29, 2008 11:06 AM:
I did not intend to directly offend anyone with previous posts. Guess I'll try to clean up the sarcasm. I'm sorry. Now what I don't appreciate is presumptuous people twisting my words or stating my opinions for me. If some of the fire breathers on this forum would not jump to conclusions about other people we might have a peaceful chat. My candidate was a gonner long ago and I have not yet fully decided who to vote for. I do really think that we should have confidence in our VPs though. Racial intolorance is still very real in this country no matter how many people try to wish it away. I have heard of 2 assasination plots against Senator Obama already. And John McCain has health problems. I don't think it silly to have concerns about these things. I think it is realistic. "
listenandhear wrote on Oct 29, 2008 11:12 AM:
brneyedgirl821 wrote on Oct 29, 2008 12:17 PM:
BTW, I am not a die hard Republican. I vote for whoever is the best person for the job or in some cases the lesser of two evils. "
brneyedgirl821 wrote on Oct 29, 2008 12:18 PM:
ozarks wrote on Oct 29, 2008 12:59 PM:
adabell wrote on Oct 29, 2008 2:22 PM:
I am by the way a registered democrat, having failed to reregister as an independent. "
listenandhear wrote on Oct 29, 2008 3:28 PM:
adabell wrote on Oct 29, 2008 3:50 PM:
Oct. 28 - A young resident of Gaza, Ibrahim Abu Jayab, is cold calling American voters to vote for Democratic presidential candidate, Barack Obama, in the final race to the White House on November 4.
How weird is that?
Muslims and arabs all over the world have contributed to Obama's campaign, no matter that it is illegal. Obama has had over twice the funds and advertising then McCain. "
brneyedgirl821 wrote on Oct 29, 2008 4:40 PM:
adabell wrote on Oct 29, 2008 5:02 PM:
BCR wrote on Oct 29, 2008 5:05 PM:
No, I'm not going to say I'm sorry. Do more research... "
sodapop wrote on Oct 29, 2008 5:12 PM:
--- "
adabell wrote on Oct 29, 2008 5:14 PM:
Do you think they have our best interests at heart? Oh right, you think it's peace.
I think it's a conflict of interest.
But Obama has been very supportive to muslims, some of who hate America. "
BCR wrote on Oct 29, 2008 5:22 PM:
To all of you who served in the military, my hat is off to you. I never served, but my son did. I truly appreciate your service. BUT, if I were you, I'd be mad if I fought in wars to guarantee the right of a free democratic vote to citizens of a foreign country, when we can't give the same guarantee to the citizens here. "
sodapop wrote on Oct 29, 2008 5:53 PM:
BigTex wrote on Oct 29, 2008 6:21 PM:
On the subject of voter fraud, I wonder how many of the "voters" illegally registered by BHO's organization ACORN are voting Democratic? "
adabell wrote on Oct 29, 2008 7:02 PM:
Whether people all over the world see Obama as a uniter, and you arrived at that conclusion how?
If you have facts to support that conclusion, share.
Obama said he would double foreign aid. That is a food reason for him to be popular abroad, as is his weakness that his own vice-presidential candidate spoke of.
Currently some foreign leaders have called his foreign policy as naive.
It has been McCain who walked across the isle and has worked with the other party, never Obama, whose voting record is the most liberal in the Senate.
So who did you think Obama will unite? "
adabell wrote on Oct 29, 2008 7:17 PM:
Britain’s Foreign Minister David Miliband said back in May of this year that Obama’s views on Iran worry him and his European colleagues. They fear, he said back then, that Obama’s plans will jeopardize their efforts to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons, thereby altering the balance of power in the region significantly.
president of France. Sarkozy too “is very critical of U.S. presidential candidate Barack Obama’s positions on Iran,” the report says, fearing that America’s attitude towards Iran in 2009 may cause the Mullahs to continue pursuing nuclear weapons, with no one willing or able to stop them.Sarkozy considers Obama’s views on Iran to be “utterly immature,”
he seems determined to pursue a highly ideological foreign policy which will put him on collision course with Europe. European politicians and columnists understand this, perhaps it is time for Americans who favor improving the Europe-U.S. relationship to pay attention to them. "
brneyedgirl821 wrote on Oct 29, 2008 7:53 PM:
sodapop wrote on Oct 29, 2008 8:19 PM:
adabell wrote on Oct 29, 2008 8:26 PM:
And from the Arabs themselves:
OBAMA! Inshallah!" – Obama! Allah willing! That slogan, scribbled on walls in Gaza, indicates the hopes that Barack Obama has inspired among Arabs.
While Obama has tried to push his origins into the background, his "Islamic roots" have won him a place in many Arabs' hearts. "
sodapop wrote on Oct 29, 2008 8:55 PM:
brneyedgirl821 wrote on Oct 29, 2008 9:38 PM:
brneyedgirl821 wrote on Oct 29, 2008 9:43 PM:
You're right only instead of p-e-a-c-e they want a large p-i-e-c-e of America. "
sodapop wrote on Oct 29, 2008 10:11 PM:
adabell wrote on Oct 30, 2008 12:09 AM:
What about praising Obama suggests they want peace. They praise Obama because of his Islam heritage. "
adabell wrote on Oct 30, 2008 12:16 AM:
Islam does not allow for conversion, it is punishable by death. They do however, allow for the pretense of conversion in order to gain power. Since both Barrack and Hussein are muslim names, and both his father and step father were muslims, and they also consider if your father is muslim you are, arabs still think of Obama as having an Islam heritage and have not yet condemned him for converting for whatever reason. This is obvious by their support of him. "
adabell wrote on Oct 30, 2008 12:22 AM:
I am a registered democrat, so Obama is my parties candidate. "
sodapop wrote on Oct 30, 2008 10:42 AM:
Barrack Obama is a Christian regardless of what you say and I don’t understand why you would try to say otherwise. If he was of a different faith or no faith, it would still not make a difference. This is America and we do not have a state religion and religious test are not part of our political process. "
brneyedgirl821 wrote on Oct 30, 2008 12:24 PM:
sodapop wrote on Oct 30, 2008 1:03 PM:
brneyedgirl821 wrote on Oct 30, 2008 1:18 PM:
adabell wrote on Oct 30, 2008 1:37 PM:
I repeat and repeat and repeat, I did not refute this.
Obama's twenty year association and friendship with Wright should give everyone pause regarding his thinking.
It is the muslims who think he's one of them.
He has had many associations with muslims as well.
No one has to make things up about Obama, one could write books about why he is inappropriate to be president. "
ozarks wrote on Oct 30, 2008 2:32 PM:
adabell wrote on Oct 30, 2008 4:28 PM:
I was surprised to find that Wendy Button, a speech writer for Obama, had the same feelings about the democratic party and is now voting for McCain, although the news media has failed to cover this. It is in the thedailybeast.com
A speechwriter for Obama, Edwards, and Clinton on why she’s voting McCain.
Since I started writing speeches more than ten years ago, I have always believed in the Democratic Party. Not anymore.
it was a privilege to help Michelle Obama with a stump speech, be considered as a speechwriter for the V.P
Democrats fostering ageism with “erratic” and jokes about Depends. Sexism. Racism. Ageism and maybe some Socialism have all made their ugly cameos in election 2008. It’s not inspiring. Perhaps this is why I found the initial mocking of Joe so offensive and I realized an old line applied: “I didn’t leave the Democratic Party; the Democratic Party left me.” "
BigTex wrote on Oct 30, 2008 6:06 PM:
"O God, humiliate Bush and his party, O Lord of the Worlds, degrade and defy him," Abu Yahya al-Libi said at the end of sermon marking the Muslim feast of Eid al-Fitr, in a video posted on the Internet.
This is from a Reuters story released today. "
Chigger wrote on Oct 30, 2008 9:41 PM:
ozarks wrote on Oct 30, 2008 10:15 PM:
adabell wrote on Oct 30, 2008 10:59 PM:
They were all of course going to vote for Obama. But the interviewer attributed McCains policies to Obama, and even did they approve of Obama's choice in Sarah Palin.
They all agreed with Obama's pro life stance, in his position about staying in Iraq, and they all thought Palin was a good choice.
One of them who agreed with all of the above did not want McCain because he thought McCain was not well educated.
Well, it may not be as funny in the retelling, but you might find it under Howard Stern.
God bless America, and whoever wins, we need it. "
brneyedgirl821 wrote on Oct 31, 2008 7:09 AM:
BCR wrote on Oct 31, 2008 9:10 AM:
First, as far as Iran's nukes, we have them, Russia has them, China, India, France, England, even Pakistan has them. Who doesn't have them? There are rumors that Israel has them, which seeing how tight they are with us, I wouldn't be surprised. Seeing it from Iran's side, if your nation had the fourth largest oil reserves in the world, a commodity that every nation needs, and is willing to take if necessary (war in Iraq), and most of those nations had nukes, wouldn't YOU want some too?
As for Rashid, the association was casual, and Obama has publicly stated that he does not support the PLO or Rashid's programs. McCain, however, was affiliated with Rashid through financial support of one of his organizations.
As for Obama being a Muslim... With 25% of the world's population being of this faith, and growing faster than any other religion, is it smart having a leader who doesn't understand the fundamentals? "
brneyedgirl821 wrote on Oct 31, 2008 9:17 AM:
brneyedgirl821 wrote on Oct 31, 2008 9:20 AM:
brneyedgirl821 wrote on Oct 31, 2008 9:21 AM:
BCR wrote on Oct 31, 2008 10:33 AM:
Reagan initiated a cold-war back down in his administration. The intent was to disarm the nuclear arsenal world wide. It never happened.
Crazy people shouldn't have nukes. Sane people should be smart enough to know they're not needed. "
brneyedgirl821 wrote on Oct 31, 2008 10:41 AM:
BCR wrote on Oct 31, 2008 10:50 AM:
brneyedgirl821 wrote on Oct 31, 2008 11:20 AM:
brneyedgirl821 wrote on Oct 31, 2008 11:32 AM:
ozarks wrote on Oct 31, 2008 11:38 AM:
ozarks wrote on Oct 31, 2008 11:47 AM:
brneyedgirl821 wrote on Oct 31, 2008 6:18 PM:
"Barack Obama's senior advisers have drawn up plans to lower expectations for his presidency if he wins next week's election, amid concerns that many of his euphoric supporters are harboring unrealistic hopes of what he can achieve.......In an interview with a Colorado radio station, Obama appeared to be engaged already in expectation lowering. Asked about his goals for the first hundred days, he said he would need more time to tackle such big and costly issues as health care reform, global warming and Iraq.
"The first hundred days is going to be important, but it's probably going to be the first thousand days that makes the difference," he said. He has also been reminding crowds in recent days how "hard" it will be to achieve his goals, and that it will take time.
Sounds like after he wins then he will tell people that he can't deliver on his promises. "
adabell wrote on Oct 31, 2008 7:29 PM:
The false statements is one of the reasons.
Even so, the programs that Obama has talked about are not new. They have been tried before in other countries and failed.
In 2001 he is on tape talking about the success and failures of the Civil Rights Movement. According to Obama, failure to redistribute wealth change. Although if you think about it, to some extent it was attempted with affirmative action and welfare programs. Over three decades of reverse discrimination did not get the desired results, neither did the harrassment of agencies like Obama's Acorn, whose goal was to give minorities mortgage loans, goal being that catch up minority home ownership to the same percentage of whites. The result was they got loans they could not pay.
Obama worked with Acorn to give schools huge financial grants, the results was there was no improvement. "
adabell wrote on Oct 31, 2008 7:38 PM:
Although neither Obama or Biden have been generous in their charitable contributions according to their taxes, Obama giving less than one % until he finally gave to Wright's church when the church was involved in the activities to which he was builiding his political career. Obama does not even contribute to his own destitute relatives, like is brother who lives in squalor, and aunt who immigrated from Kenya to Boston and lives in public housing. She will not give an interview until after the election.
McCain and Cindy give 29% to charity. Yet Obama had the audacity to say, "when did McCain decide that selfishness was a virtue." because McCain spoke against redistribution of wealth and socialism. Is that hypocritical or what? "
adabell wrote on Oct 31, 2008 7:42 PM:
Gary wrote on Oct 31, 2008 8:56 PM:
This country has been heading that way for years, I personally don't want this country that way.
I'm tired of supporting people who don't want to work or take responsibility for themselves, and I'm tired of helping ILLEGALS! "
brneyedgirl821 wrote on Nov 1, 2008 12:30 PM:
adabell wrote on Nov 1, 2008 1:09 PM:
The shock is this has been going on, and Obama zealots ignore the facts. "
ozarks wrote on Nov 1, 2008 4:47 PM:
brneyedgirl821 wrote on Nov 1, 2008 8:21 PM:
adabell wrote on Nov 1, 2008 10:04 PM:
What will be even more interesting, since she has been ordered by a judge to leave, will be what if anything Obama does if he becomes president, if exceptions will be made for his relatives.
And though Obama talks about the selfishness of those against redistribution of wealth, she has to live in public housing, helped with tax money, but not Obama's personal income, even though he's got the bucks. "
adabell wrote on Nov 1, 2008 10:07 PM:
I agree what they did to Sarah's family is disgraceful.
The things they released about her daughter was no one elses business and had nothing to do with the tea in China. "
adabell wrote on Nov 2, 2008 10:50 PM:
Courts in Hawaii , a state controlled by liberal Democrats, have denied the public access to Obama's birth records by finding that the American people do not have "a tangible interest" in Obama's birth records. In addition, Barack Obama and his lawyers have stopped the release of his records at Columbia University , Occidental College, and Harvard Law School, all of which should include his birth information. "
mec wrote on Nov 3, 2008 7:10 AM:
So let's see, BHO can claim to be a Christian because it is not valid in the eyes of Islam. He can claim anything to indidels. "
brneyedgirl821 wrote on Nov 3, 2008 9:03 AM:
mec wrote on Nov 3, 2008 9:18 AM:
The libs in this country have ALL the information needed to discredit BHO as a presidential candidate but they choose to not pay any attention to the warnings. What is more frightening is the media,the weathy and the politicians who actually defend him for the office. The dems buy their power. They pay big bucks to woo the LIVS and and the pathetic blind-to-fact and they follow in lock-step with them. Lock-step, such an appropriate term for what it sounds like we will be living with after 11-4-08 "
brneyedgirl821 wrote on Nov 3, 2008 12:34 PM:
brneyedgirl821 wrote on Nov 3, 2008 12:35 PM:
mec wrote on Nov 3, 2008 5:44 PM:
I am not looking forward to the election results. Either way it turns out, our country will be in serious jeopardy. One will be internally with riots by the BHO radical supporters should he not win and of course, the charges the election was rigged. And should he win,terrorists are just waiting for their chance to hit us again.
Also should he win, internally, racist crackpots like the skinhead from AR, will act out against him and that is something I absolutely reject. I will actually pray for him everyday.
Our country will change tomorrow and I fear for the worst. All because lemming libs wouldn't do their own fact finding. I will enjoy telling all my lemming friends and relatives...I told you so !!! "
Chigger wrote on Nov 4, 2008 2:40 AM:
Maj. Gen. Craig Campbell, adjutant general of the Alaska National Guard, ...in an interview with The Associated Press on Sunday, said he and (Governor)Palin play no role in national defense activities, even when they involve the Alaska National Guard. The entire operation is under federal control, and the governor is not briefed on situations.
Do a little research before quoting Republican spokesmen trying to pull the wool over your eyes. "
brneyedgirl821 wrote on Nov 4, 2008 6:44 AM:
brneyedgirl821 wrote on Nov 4, 2008 6:46 AM:
mec wrote on Nov 4, 2008 6:12 PM:
Obama wants the nation smoke free, not just the state of Illinois. Chicago is the murder capital of the nation. Jennifer Hudson's family were murdered in the South side of the city. People there don't even call police when they hear gun shots because it's so often. Oh did I mention Chicago has banned guns for years. Start saying goodbye to your guns because he will ban them nationally too.
Obama=Blagoavich, soon to be indicted governor of Illinois=$$$$ to Barry
Obama=Rezko, recently convicted real estate guy who gave money and favors to you know who=$$$$$ to Barry
Obama=ACORN, Oh never mind. No democrat or liberal cares one iota about this dangerous crook. They only want power.
If they get the power, people like me and brneyedgirl821, will be watching very closely and point out the "I told you so" and/or "well you wanted him" etc. It will be fun. "


Robert5000 wrote on Oct 25, 2008 7:47 PM:
Good bye George and Richard. We will miss you both a great deal because of your sound judgment in committing our country to the invasion and very expensive protracted war in Iraq. And thanks so much for also establishing reasonable regulatory oversight of Wall Street and of our mortgage lending and financial system during your 8 year watch.
Sorry Bill and Hillary. Of course we really wanted to have you back again in order to give Bill another shot at finding some more action with interns in the oval office; and we will certainly miss not being able to hear all the details of such encounters.
John, we will always respect you for putting the needs of our country above petty politics in choosing your running mate; but Sarah, unfortunately it looks like we may never get the chance to fulfill our wildest dream: to someday have President Palin lead the free world. "